lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ygdfe3XSvN8iFuUc@kroah.com>
Date:   Sat, 12 Feb 2022 08:19:23 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     "T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@...gle.com>
Cc:     Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
        Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>,
        Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
        Hridya Valsaraju <hridya@...gle.com>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
        Liam Mark <lmark@...eaurora.org>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@....com>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, kaleshsingh@...gle.com,
        Kenny.Ho@....com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 6/6] android: binder: Add a buffer flag to relinquish
 ownership of fds

On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 04:18:29PM +0000, T.J. Mercier wrote:
> This patch introduces a buffer flag BINDER_BUFFER_FLAG_SENDER_NO_NEED
> that a process sending an fd array to another process over binder IPC
> can set to relinquish ownership of the fds being sent for memory
> accounting purposes. If the flag is found to be set during the fd array
> translation and the fd is for a DMA-BUF, the buffer is uncharged from
> the sender's cgroup and charged to the receiving process's cgroup
> instead.
> 
> It is up to the sending process to ensure that it closes the fds
> regardless of whether the transfer failed or succeeded.
> 
> Most graphics shared memory allocations in Android are done by the
> graphics allocator HAL process. On requests from clients, the HAL process
> allocates memory and sends the fds to the clients over binder IPC.
> The graphics allocator HAL will not retain any references to the
> buffers. When the HAL sets the BINDER_BUFFER_FLAG_SENDER_NO_NEED for fd
> arrays holding DMA-BUF fds, the gpu cgroup controller will be able to
> correctly charge the buffers to the client processes instead of the
> graphics allocator HAL.
> 
> From: Hridya Valsaraju <hridya@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hridya Valsaraju <hridya@...gle.com>
> Co-developed-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@...gle.com>
> ---
> changes in v2
> - Move dma-buf cgroup charge transfer from a dma_buf_op defined by every
> heap to a single dma-buf function for all heaps per Daniel Vetter and
> Christian König.
> 
>  drivers/android/binder.c            | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/uapi/linux/android/binder.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/android/binder.c b/drivers/android/binder.c
> index 8351c5638880..f50d88ded188 100644
> --- a/drivers/android/binder.c
> +++ b/drivers/android/binder.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
>  
>  #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
>  
> +#include <linux/dma-buf.h>
>  #include <linux/fdtable.h>
>  #include <linux/file.h>
>  #include <linux/freezer.h>
> @@ -2482,8 +2483,10 @@ static int binder_translate_fd_array(struct list_head *pf_head,
>  {
>  	binder_size_t fdi, fd_buf_size;
>  	binder_size_t fda_offset;
> +	bool transfer_gpu_charge = false;
>  	const void __user *sender_ufda_base;
>  	struct binder_proc *proc = thread->proc;
> +	struct binder_proc *target_proc = t->to_proc;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	fd_buf_size = sizeof(u32) * fda->num_fds;
> @@ -2521,8 +2524,15 @@ static int binder_translate_fd_array(struct list_head *pf_head,
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CGROUP_GPU) &&
> +		parent->flags & BINDER_BUFFER_FLAG_SENDER_NO_NEED)
> +		transfer_gpu_charge = true;
> +
>  	for (fdi = 0; fdi < fda->num_fds; fdi++) {
>  		u32 fd;
> +		struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
> +		struct gpucg *gpucg;
> +
>  		binder_size_t offset = fda_offset + fdi * sizeof(fd);
>  		binder_size_t sender_uoffset = fdi * sizeof(fd);
>  
> @@ -2532,6 +2542,22 @@ static int binder_translate_fd_array(struct list_head *pf_head,
>  						  in_reply_to);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret > 0 ? -EINVAL : ret;
> +
> +		if (!transfer_gpu_charge)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		dmabuf = dma_buf_get(fd);
> +		if (IS_ERR(dmabuf))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		gpucg = gpucg_get(target_proc->tsk);
> +		ret = dma_buf_charge_transfer(dmabuf, gpucg);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			pr_warn("%d:%d Unable to transfer DMA-BUF fd charge to %d",
> +				proc->pid, thread->pid, target_proc->pid);
> +			gpucg_put(gpucg);
> +		}
> +		dma_buf_put(dmabuf);
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/android/binder.h b/include/uapi/linux/android/binder.h
> index 3246f2c74696..169fd5069a1a 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/android/binder.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/android/binder.h
> @@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ struct binder_buffer_object {
>  
>  enum {
>  	BINDER_BUFFER_FLAG_HAS_PARENT = 0x01,
> +	BINDER_BUFFER_FLAG_SENDER_NO_NEED = 0x02,
>  };
>  
>  /* struct binder_fd_array_object - object describing an array of fds in a buffer
> -- 
> 2.35.1.265.g69c8d7142f-goog
> 

How does userspace know that binder supports this new flag?  And where
is the userspace test for this new feature?  Isn't there a binder test
framework somewhere?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ