[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YglQW7gVNoRJ7QpQ@dev-arch.archlinux-ax161>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 11:39:23 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: Tong Zhang <ztong0001@...il.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: fix build issue when using clang
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 10:51:06PM -0800, Tong Zhang wrote:
> drm/i915 target adds some extra cflags, especially it does re-apply -Wall.
> In clang this will override -Wno-format-security and cause the build to
> fail when CONFIG_DRM_I915_WERROR=y. While with GCC this does not happen.
> We reapply -Wno-format-security here to get around this issue.
For what it's worth, GCC would warn in the exact same way if
-Wformat-security was included within -Wall like it is for clang:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c: In function ‘intel_gt_invalidate_tlbs’:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c:988:9: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security]
988 | GEM_TRACE("\n");
| ^~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c: In function ‘live_sanitycheck’:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c:142:25: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security]
142 | GEM_TRACE("spinner failed to start\n");
| ^~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c: In function ‘live_preempt’:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c:1775:25: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security]
1775 | GEM_TRACE("lo spinner failed to start\n");
| ^~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_execlists.c:1792:25: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security]
1792 | GEM_TRACE("hi spinner failed to start\n");
| ^~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
If fixing these warnings instead of just disabling the warning is
undesirable (since I feel like the entire point of the i195 cflags
situation is to enable more warnings than the main Makefile), I think
the commit message should be rewritten to something along the lines of:
"drm/i915 adds some extra cflags, namely -Wall, which causes
instances of -Wformat-security to appear when building with clang, even
though this warning is turned off kernel-wide in the main Makefile:"
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c:983:2: error: format string is not a string literal (potentially insecure) [-Werror,-Wformat-security]
> GEM_TRACE("ERROR\n");
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h:76:24: note: expanded from macro 'GEM_TRACE'
> #define GEM_TRACE(...) trace_printk(__VA_ARGS__)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./include/linux/kernel.h:369:3: note: expanded from macro 'trace_printk'
> do_trace_printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ./include/linux/kernel.h:383:30: note: expanded from macro 'do_trace_printk'
> __trace_bprintk(_THIS_IP_, trace_printk_fmt, ##args); \
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c:983:2: note: treat the string as an argument to avoid this
"This does not happen with GCC because it does not enable
-Wformat-security with -Wall. Disable -Wformat-security within the i915
Makefile so that these warnings do not show up with clang."
The actual diff itself looks fine to me.
Cheers,
Nathan
> Signed-off-by: Tong Zhang <ztong0001@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
> index 1b62b9f65196..c04e05a3d39f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> # will most likely get a sudden build breakage... Hopefully we will fix
> # new warnings before CI updates!
> subdir-ccflags-y := -Wall -Wextra
> +subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-format-security
> subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-unused-parameter
> subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-type-limits
> subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-missing-field-initializers
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists