[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa2bf24e-981a-a811-c5d8-a75f0b8f693a@acm.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 15:06:39 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
syzbot <syzbot+831661966588c802aae9@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
jgg@...pe.ca, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] possible deadlock in worker_thread
On 2/12/22 09:14, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> How can reviewing all flush_workqueue(system_long_wq) calls help?
It is allowed to queue blocking actions on system_long_wq.
flush_workqueue(system_long_wq) can make a lower layer (e.g. ib_srp)
wait on a blocking action from a higher layer (e.g. the loop driver) and
thereby cause a deadlock. Hence my proposal to review all
flush_workqueue(system_long_wq) calls.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists