linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.16 127/203] ACPI: PM: s2idle: Cancel wakeup before dispatching EC GPE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:26:11 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.16 127/203] ACPI: PM: s2idle: Cancel wakeup before dispatching EC GPE

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

[ Upstream commit dc0075ba7f387fe4c48a8c674b11ab6f374a6acc ]

Commit 4a9af6cac050 ("ACPI: EC: Rework flushing of EC work while
suspended to idle") made acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe() check
pm_wakeup_pending(), but that is before canceling the SCI wakeup,
so pm_wakeup_pending() is always true.  This causes the loop in
acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe() to always terminate after one iteration which
may not be correct.

Address this issue by canceling the SCI wakeup earlier, from
acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe() itself.

Fixes: 4a9af6cac050 ("ACPI: EC: Rework flushing of EC work while suspended to idle")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/acpi/ec.c    | 10 ++++++++++
 drivers/acpi/sleep.c | 14 ++++----------
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
index b9c44e6c5e400..1712990bf2ad8 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
@@ -2051,6 +2051,16 @@ bool acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe(void)
 	if (acpi_any_gpe_status_set(first_ec->gpe))
 		return true;
 
+	/*
+	 * Cancel the SCI wakeup and process all pending events in case there
+	 * are any wakeup ones in there.
+	 *
+	 * Note that if any non-EC GPEs are active at this point, the SCI will
+	 * retrigger after the rearming in acpi_s2idle_wake(), so no events
+	 * should be missed by canceling the wakeup here.
+	 */
+	pm_system_cancel_wakeup();
+
 	/*
 	 * Dispatch the EC GPE in-band, but do not report wakeup in any case
 	 * to allow the caller to process events properly after that.
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
index 9f237dc9d45fc..8513410ca2fc2 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
@@ -739,21 +739,15 @@ bool acpi_s2idle_wake(void)
 			return true;
 		}
 
-		/* Check non-EC GPE wakeups and dispatch the EC GPE. */
+		/*
+		 * Check non-EC GPE wakeups and if there are none, cancel the
+		 * SCI-related wakeup and dispatch the EC GPE.
+		 */
 		if (acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe()) {
 			pm_pr_dbg("ACPI non-EC GPE wakeup\n");
 			return true;
 		}
 
-		/*
-		 * Cancel the SCI wakeup and process all pending events in case
-		 * there are any wakeup ones in there.
-		 *
-		 * Note that if any non-EC GPEs are active at this point, the
-		 * SCI will retrigger after the rearming below, so no events
-		 * should be missed by canceling the wakeup here.
-		 */
-		pm_system_cancel_wakeup();
 		acpi_os_wait_events_complete();
 
 		/*
-- 
2.34.1