[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ygo6pqWmkTWJNNcR@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 12:19:02 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, joseph.salisbury@...onical.com,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] selftests/ftrace: Do not trace do_softirq because of
PREEMPT_RT
On 2022-02-14 09:36:57 [+0100], Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The PREEMPT_RT patchset does not use do_softirq() function thus trying
> to filter for do_softirq fails for such kernel:
>
> echo do_softirq
> ftracetest: 81: echo: echo: I/O error
>
> Choose some other visible function for the test. The function does not
> have to be actually executed during the test, because it is only testing
> filter API interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
> Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> Notes:
> I understand that the failure does not exist on mainline kernel (only
> with PREEMPT_RT patchset) but the change does not harm it.
Yes, and now it does not sound (to me) like duct tape. Thank you.
> If it is not suitable alone, please consider it for RT patchset.
We trying to get it merged so…
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists