linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] usb: host: ehci-sunplus: Add driver for ehci in Sunplus SP7021

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Ygo980Tg3aZdDQDH@kroah.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Feb 2022 12:33:07 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     施錕鴻 <vincent.sunplus@...il.com>
Cc:     stern@...land.harvard.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, wells.lu@...plus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] usb: host: ehci-sunplus: Add driver for ehci in
 Sunplus SP7021

On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 05:48:20PM +0800, 施錕鴻 wrote:
> Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> 於 2022年2月14日 週一 下午5:14寫道：
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 05:03:00PM +0800, 施錕鴻 wrote:
> > > Hi, Greg
> > >     About this issue, my colleague Hammer Hsieh has explained it to
> > > you recently in the mail of "[PATCH v7 2/2] serial: sunplus-uart: Add
> > > Sunplus
> > > SoC UART Driver". The ehci driver and uart one are in the same Sunplus Soc.
> >
> > I do not know what you are referring to, sorry.  Remember we get
> > thousands of emails a week.
> >
> > Please be explicit and make the code work properly for each patch you
> > submit.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> Hi, Greg
>     About data incoherence issue between memory bus and peripheral bus.
> In case of AXI bus, use non-posted write can avoid data incoherence issue.
>     What if in case of post write:
> Send a specific command after last write command. SDCTRL identify specific
> command, means previous write command done. Then send the interrupt
> signal to interrupt controller. And then interrupt controller sends done signal
> to Master. Master receives done signal, means write command done. Then
> issue a interrupt or proceed next write command.

I do not understand what you are referring to here as I have no context
:(