lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220214142936.41bd3e7d@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Mon, 14 Feb 2022 14:29:36 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc:     Ajish Koshy <Ajish.Koshy@...rochip.com>,
        John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Viswas G <Viswas.G@...rochip.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with Linus' tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the scsi-mkp tree got conflicts in:

  drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_hwi.c
  drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c

between commit:

  c26b85ea1636 ("scsi: pm80xx: Fix double completion for SATA devices")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  26fc0ea74fcb ("scsi: libsas: Drop SAS_TASK_AT_INITIATOR")

from the scsi-mkp tree.

I fixed it up (the former removed the code modified by the latter) and
can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ