[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <164484328403.12994.4553763831627919088.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 12:54:44 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@...adcom.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 0/9] use GFP_KERNEL
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 21:42:14 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Platform_driver and pci_driver probe functions aren't called with
> locks held and thus don't need GFP_ATOMIC. Use GFP_KERNEL instead.
>
> All changes have been compile-tested.
>
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[3/9] ASoC: Intel: bytcr_wm5102: use GFP_KERNEL
commit: 695c105933cfa04ccf84088342193ae43e37e0f5
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
Powered by blists - more mailing lists