[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220214134303.GA929467@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:43:03 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, rafael@...nel.org,
Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@....nxp.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
Stuart Yoder <stuyoder@...il.com>,
Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/14] driver core: platform: Add driver dma ownership
management
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 02:37:15PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 09:18:53AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:59:50AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >
> > > > + if (ret && !drv->no_kernel_api_dma)
> > > > + iommu_device_unuse_dma_api(dev);
> > >
> > > So you are now going to call this for every platform driver _unless_
> > > they set this flag?
> >
> > Yes, it is necessary because VFIO supports platform devices as well
> > and needs to ensure security. Conflicting kernel driver attachements
> > must be blocked, just like for PCI.
>
> A platform device shouldn't be using VFIO, but ugh, oh well, that ship
> has sailed :(
I don't know why you say that, but yes, this is was set long ago.
> And stop it with the "security" mess, do not give people a false sense
> of it here please.
I'm confused by what you mean. This is all about what we tend to refer
to as DMA security - meaning a device's DMA can be controled by a
hostile environment and not impact the integrity of the kernel.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists