Message-ID: <00000000000042c23305d7fbb189@google.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Feb 2022 07:01:34 -0800
From:   syzbot <syzbot+284f395a179db7a165b1@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To:     andrew@...n.ch, ast@...nel.org, claudiajkang@...il.com,
        daniel@...earbox.net, davem@...emloft.net, ennoerlangen@...il.com,
        george.mccollister@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, marco.wenzel@...berle.de,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] bpf-next test error: WARNING: suspicious RCU usage in hsr_node_get_first

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    9c3de619e13e libbpf: Use dynamically allocated buffer when..
git tree:       bpf-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=101b14a4700000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=3fa7f88a3821006b
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=284f395a179db7a165b1
compiler:       gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+284f395a179db7a165b1@...kaller.appspotmail.com

batman_adv: batadv0: The MTU of interface batadv_slave_1 is too small (1500) to handle the transport of batman-adv packets. Packets going over this interface will be fragmented on layer2 which could impact the performance. Setting the MTU to 1560 would solve the problem.
batman_adv: batadv0: Not using interface batadv_slave_1 (retrying later): interface not active
=============================
WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
5.17.0-rc2-syzkaller-00955-g9c3de619e13e #0 Not tainted
-----------------------------
net/hsr/hsr_framereg.c:34 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!

other info that might help us debug this:


rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
2 locks held by syz-executor.0/3604:
 #0: ffffffff8d32caa8 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnl_lock net/core/rtnetlink.c:72 [inline]
 #0: ffffffff8d32caa8 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3be/0xb80 net/core/rtnetlink.c:5591
 #1: ffff888019e195f0 (&hsr->list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:354 [inline]
 #1: ffff888019e195f0 (&hsr->list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: hsr_create_self_node+0x225/0x650 net/hsr/hsr_framereg.c:108

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 3604 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.17.0-rc2-syzkaller-00955-g9c3de619e13e #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106
 hsr_node_get_first+0x9b/0xb0 net/hsr/hsr_framereg.c:34
 hsr_create_self_node+0x22d/0x650 net/hsr/hsr_framereg.c:109
 hsr_dev_finalize+0x2c1/0x7d0 net/hsr/hsr_device.c:514
 hsr_newlink+0x315/0x730 net/hsr/hsr_netlink.c:102
 __rtnl_newlink+0x107c/0x1760 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3481
 rtnl_newlink+0x64/0xa0 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3529
 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x413/0xb80 net/core/rtnetlink.c:5594
 netlink_rcv_skb+0x153/0x420 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2494
 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1317 [inline]
 netlink_unicast+0x539/0x7e0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1343
 netlink_sendmsg+0x904/0xe00 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1919
 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:705 [inline]
 sock_sendmsg+0xcf/0x120 net/socket.c:725
 __sys_sendto+0x21c/0x320 net/socket.c:2040
 __do_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2052 [inline]
 __se_sys_sendto net/socket.c:2048 [inline]
 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdd/0x1b0 net/socket.c:2048
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7fa727558e1c
Code: fa fa ff ff 44 8b 4c 24 2c 4c 8b 44 24 20 89 c5 44 8b 54 24 28 48 8b 54 24 18 b8 2c 00 00 00 48 8b 74 24 10 8b 7c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 34 89 ef 48 89 44 24 08 e8 20 fb ff ff 48 8b
RSP: 002b:00007ffe062c7d90 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fa7285f1320 RCX: 00007fa727558e1c
RDX: 0000000000000048 RSI: 00007fa7285f1370 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007ffe062c7de4 R09: 000000000000000c
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007fa7285f1370 R14: 0000000000000003 R15: 0000000000000000
 </TASK>
device hsr_slave_0 entered promiscuous mode
device hsr_slave_1 entered promiscuous mode
netdevsim netdevsim0 netdevsim0: renamed from eth0
netdevsim netdevsim0 netdevsim1: renamed from eth1
netdevsim netdevsim0 netdevsim2: renamed from eth2
netdevsim netdevsim0 netdevsim3: renamed from eth3
bridge0: port 2(bridge_slave_1) entered blocking state
bridge0: port 2(bridge_slave_1) entered forwarding state
bridge0: port 1(bridge_slave_0) entered blocking state
bridge0: port 1(bridge_slave_0) entered forwarding state
8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device bond0
8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device team0
IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): hsr0: link becomes ready
8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device batadv0
device veth0_vlan entered promiscuous mode
device veth1_vlan entered promiscuous mode
device veth0_macvtap entered promiscuous mode
device veth1_macvtap entered promiscuous mode
batman_adv: batadv0: Interface activated: batadv_slave_0
batman_adv: batadv0: Interface activated: batadv_slave_1
netdevsim netdevsim0 netdevsim0: set [1, 0] type 2 family 0 port 6081 - 0
netdevsim netdevsim0 netdevsim1: set [1, 0] type 2 family 0 port 6081 - 0
netdevsim netdevsim0 netdevsim2: set [1, 0] type 2 family 0 port 6081 - 0
netdevsim netdevsim0 netdevsim3: set [1, 0] type 2 family 0 port 6081 - 0
syz-executor.0 (3604) used greatest stack depth: 22592 bytes left


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists