[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM5PR12MB18509DCA809CCE62A4A74133C0339@DM5PR12MB1850.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 04:49:59 +0000
From: Akhil R <akhilrajeev@...dia.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
"christian.koenig@....com" <christian.koenig@....com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>,
"p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"sumit.semwal@...aro.org" <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
"thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@...il.com>,
Micha©© Miros©©aw
<mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
Krishna Yarlagadda <kyarlagadda@...dia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RESEND] i2c: tegra: Add SMBus block read function
> 12.02.2022 19:20, Dmitry Osipenko ¬á¬Ú¬ê¬Ö¬ä:
> > 12.02.2022 19:15, Dmitry Osipenko ¬á¬Ú¬ê¬Ö¬ä:
> >> 11.02.2022 12:11, Akhil R ¬á¬Ú¬ê¬Ö¬ä:
> >>>> 10.02.2022 18:36, Akhil R ¬á¬Ú¬ê¬Ö¬ä:
> >>>>> Emulate SMBus block read using ContinueXfer to read the length byte
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Akhil R <akhilrajeev@...dia.com>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
> >>>>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
> >>>>> index 03cea102ab76..2941e42aa6a0 100644
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
> >>>>> @@ -1233,6 +1233,11 @@ static int tegra_i2c_xfer_msg(struct
> tegra_i2c_dev
> >>>> *i2c_dev,
> >>>>> return err;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> i2c_dev->msg_buf = msg->buf;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + /* The condition true implies smbus block read and len is already read
> */
> >>>>> + if (msg->flags & I2C_M_RECV_LEN && end_state !=
> >>>> MSG_END_CONTINUE)
> >>>>> + i2c_dev->msg_buf = msg->buf + 1;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining = msg->len;
> >>>>> i2c_dev->msg_err = I2C_ERR_NONE;
> >>>>> i2c_dev->msg_read = !!(msg->flags & I2C_M_RD);
> >>>>> @@ -1389,6 +1394,15 @@ static int tegra_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter
> *adap,
> >>>> struct i2c_msg msgs[],
> >>>>> else
> >>>>> end_type = MSG_END_REPEAT_START;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>> + /* If M_RECV_LEN use ContinueXfer to read the first byte */
> >>>>> + if (msgs[i].flags & I2C_M_RECV_LEN) {
> >>>>> + ret = tegra_i2c_xfer_msg(i2c_dev, &msgs[i],
> >>>> MSG_END_CONTINUE);
> >>>>> + if (ret)
> >>>>> + break;
> >>>>> + /* Set the read byte as msg len */
> >>>>> + msgs[i].len = msgs[i].buf[0];
> >>>>> + dev_dbg(i2c_dev->dev, "reading %d bytes\n", msgs[i].len);
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> ret = tegra_i2c_xfer_msg(i2c_dev, &msgs[i], end_type);
> >>>>> if (ret)
> >>>>> break;
> >>>>> @@ -1416,10 +1430,10 @@ static u32 tegra_i2c_func(struct i2c_adapter
> >>>> *adap)
> >>>>> {
> >>>>> struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev = i2c_get_adapdata(adap);
> >>>>> u32 ret = I2C_FUNC_I2C | (I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_EMUL &
> >>>> ~I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_QUICK) |
> >>>>> - I2C_FUNC_10BIT_ADDR | I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING;
> >>>>> + I2C_FUNC_10BIT_ADDR | I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> if (i2c_dev->hw->has_continue_xfer_support)
> >>>>> - ret |= I2C_FUNC_NOSTART;
> >>>>> + ret |= I2C_FUNC_NOSTART |
> I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_READ_BLOCK_DATA;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> return ret;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> Please describe how this was tested.
> >>> This is tested using an I2C EEPROM to emulate SMBus block read in which
> >>> we read the first byte as the length of bytes to read. This is an expected
> >>> feature for NVIDIA Grace chipset where there will be an actual SMBus
> device.
> >>
> >> We have several Tegra30+ tablets that have EC on SMBus. Svyatoslav tried
> >> your I2C patch + [1] on Asus TF201 and reported that it breaks EC. Any
> >> idea why it doesn't work?
> >>
> >> [1]
> >> https://github.com/grate-
> driver/linux/commit/aa8d71f5a960ef40503e5448c622d62d1c53a2c0
> >
> > Ah, I see now that I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WRITE_BLOCK_DATA not supported,
> we
> > should check again without the write then.
>
> We also missed that i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data() populates the first
> byte of the read data with the transfer size. So
> i2c_smbus_read_block_data() actually works properly.
>
> It's unclear to me what's the point of emulating
> I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_READ_BLOCK_DATA within the driver if you could use
> i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data().
We are looking to support I2C_M_RECV_LEN where the length is read from the
first byte of data. I see that i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data() requires the length
to be passed from the client driver.
BTW, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WRITE_BLOCK_DATA is also expected to be supported.
It is included in I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_EMUL. I suppose, it doesn't require any additional
change in the driver. The client driver should populate the first byte as the length
of data to be transferred.
Thanks,
Akhil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists