linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 21/66] media: sun6i-csi: Always set exclusive module clock rate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YgqDxWwUeVQu+05O@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Feb 2022 18:31:01 +0200
From:   Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>
Cc:     linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        Yong Deng <yong.deng@...ewell.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 21/66] media: sun6i-csi: Always set exclusive module
 clock rate

Hi Paul,

Thanks for the patchbomb.

On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 07:53:44PM +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> In some situations the default rate of the module clock is not the
> required one for operation (for example when reconfiguring the clock
> tree to use a different parent). As a result, always set the correct
> rate for the clock (and take care of cleanup).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>
> ---
>  .../platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi.c      | 54 ++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi.c b/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi.c
> index 8155e9560164..2355088fdc37 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi.c
> @@ -856,28 +849,53 @@ static int sun6i_csi_resources_setup(struct sun6i_csi_device *csi_dev,
>  		return PTR_ERR(csi_dev->clk_ram);
>  	}
>  
> +	if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "allwinner,sun50i-a64-csi"))
> +		clk_mod_rate = 300000000;
> +	else
> +		clk_mod_rate = 297000000;

This would be nice to put in OF match data.

Of course the driver did this already before the patch. The approach still
scales badly.

-- 
Regards,

Sakari Ailus