lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOnJCU+cWBDrN-3Z37m8xA1GPrJY+JaOweYMiZBxJ-cT7ii_5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Feb 2022 12:42:32 -0800
From:   Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>
To:     Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] RISC-V: Implement multi-letter ISA extension
 probing framework

On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 12:24 PM Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de> wrote:
>
> Am Montag, 14. Februar 2022, 21:14:13 CET schrieb Atish Patra:
> > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 12:06 PM Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > Am Donnerstag, 10. Februar 2022, 22:40:16 CET schrieb Atish Patra:
> > > > Multi-letter extensions can be probed using exising
> > > > riscv_isa_extension_available API now. It doesn't support versioning
> > > > right now as there is no use case for it.
> > > > Individual extension specific implementation will be added during
> > > > each extension support.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
> > >
> > >
> > > By the way, does a similar parsing exist for opensbi as well?
> > > Things like svpbmt as well as zicbom have CSR bits controlling how
> > > these functions should behave (enabling them, etc), so I guess
> > > opensbi also needs to parse the extensions from the ISA string?
> > >
> > >
> >
> > No. Currently, OpenSBI relies on the CSR read/write & trap method to
> > identify the extensions [1].
> >
> > https://github.com/riscv-software-src/opensbi/blob/master/lib/sbi/sbi_hart.c#L404
>
> I guess my question is more, who is supposed to set CBIE, CBCFE bits in the
> ENVCFG CSR. I.e. at it's default settings CMO instructions will cause
> illegal instructions until the level above does allow them.
>
> When the kernel wants to call a cache-invalidate, from my reading menvcfg
> needs to be modified accordingly - which would fall in SBI's court?
>

I think so. I had the same question for the SSTC extension as well.
This is what I currently do:

1. Detect menvcfg first, detect stimecmp
2. Enable SSTC feature only if both are available
3. Set the STCE bit in menvcfg if SSTC is available

Here is the patch
https://github.com/atishp04/opensbi/commit/e6b185821e8302bffdceb4633b413252e0de4889

>
> > In the future, zicbom can be detected in the same manner. However,
> > svpbmt is a bit tricky as it doesn't
> > define any new CSR. Do you think OpenSBI needs to detect svpbmt for any reason ?
>
> There is the PBMTE bit in MENVCFG, which I found while looking through the
> zicbom-parts, which is supposed to "control wheter svpbmt is available for
> use". So I guess the question is the same as above :-)
>

PBMTE bit in MENVCFG says if PBMTE bit is available or not. OpenSBI
needs other way to
detect if PBMTE is available.

That's why, I think MENVCFG should be set correctly by the hardware
upon reset. What do you think
about that ? I couldn't find anything related to the reset state for menvcfg.

>
> Heiko
>
>
> > > Heiko
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > >  2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> > > > index 5ce50468aff1..170bd80da520 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/hwcap.h
> > > > @@ -34,7 +34,25 @@ extern unsigned long elf_hwcap;
> > > >  #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_s              ('s' - 'a')
> > > >  #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_u              ('u' - 'a')
> > > >
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * Increse this to higher value as kernel support more ISA extensions.
> > > > + */
> > > >  #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX    64
> > > > +#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_NAME_LEN_MAX 32
> > > > +
> > > > +/* The base ID for multi-letter ISA extensions */
> > > > +#define RISCV_ISA_EXT_BASE 26
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * This enum represent the logical ID for each multi-letter RISC-V ISA extension.
> > > > + * The logical ID should start from RISCV_ISA_EXT_BASE and must not exceed
> > > > + * RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX. 0-25 range is reserved for single letter
> > > > + * extensions while all the multi-letter extensions should define the next
> > > > + * available logical extension id.
> > > > + */
> > > > +enum riscv_isa_ext_id {
> > > > +     RISCV_ISA_EXT_ID_MAX = RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX,
> > > > +};
> > > >
> > > >  unsigned long riscv_isa_extension_base(const unsigned long *isa_bitmap);
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> > > > index e9e3b0693d16..469b9739faf7 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> > > > @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ void __init riscv_fill_hwcap(void)
> > > >
> > > >       for_each_of_cpu_node(node) {
> > > >               unsigned long this_hwcap = 0;
> > > > -             unsigned long this_isa = 0;
> > > > +             uint64_t this_isa = 0;
> > > >
> > > >               if (riscv_of_processor_hartid(node) < 0)
> > > >                       continue;
> > > > @@ -169,12 +169,22 @@ void __init riscv_fill_hwcap(void)
> > > >                       if (*isa != '_')
> > > >                               --isa;
> > > >
> > > > +#define SET_ISA_EXT_MAP(name, bit)                                           \
> > > > +                     do {                                                    \
> > > > +                             if ((ext_end - ext == sizeof(name) - 1) &&      \
> > > > +                                  !memcmp(ext, name, sizeof(name) - 1)) {    \
> > > > +                                     this_isa |= (1UL << bit);               \
> > > > +                                     pr_info("Found ISA extension %s", name);\
> > > > +                             }                                               \
> > > > +                     } while (false)                                         \
> > > > +
> > > >                       if (unlikely(ext_err))
> > > >                               continue;
> > > >                       if (!ext_long) {
> > > >                               this_hwcap |= isa2hwcap[(unsigned char)(*ext)];
> > > >                               this_isa |= (1UL << (*ext - 'a'));
> > > >                       }
> > > > +#undef SET_ISA_EXT_MAP
> > > >               }
> > > >
> > > >               /*
> > > > @@ -187,10 +197,21 @@ void __init riscv_fill_hwcap(void)
> > > >               else
> > > >                       elf_hwcap = this_hwcap;
> > > >
> > > > -             if (riscv_isa[0])
> > > > +             if (riscv_isa[0]) {
> > > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT)
> > > > +                     riscv_isa[0] &= this_isa & 0xFFFFFFFF;
> > > > +                     riscv_isa[1] &= this_isa >> 32;
> > > > +#else
> > > >                       riscv_isa[0] &= this_isa;
> > > > -             else
> > > > +#endif
> > > > +             } else {
> > > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT)
> > > > +                     riscv_isa[0] = this_isa & 0xFFFFFFFF;
> > > > +                     riscv_isa[1] = this_isa >> 32;
> > > > +#else
> > > >                       riscv_isa[0] = this_isa;
> > > > +#endif
> > > > +             }
> > > >       }
> > > >
> > > >       /* We don't support systems with F but without D, so mask those out
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Atish

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ