[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C88FC9A7-D6AD-4382-B74A-175922F57852@fb.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 19:26:49 +0000
From: Chris Mason <clm@...com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@...hat.com>
CC: "riel@...riel.com" <riel@...riel.com>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC fs/namespace] Make kern_unmount() use
synchronize_rcu_expedited()
> On Feb 14, 2022, at 2:05 PM, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Experimental. Not for inclusion. Yet, anyway.
>
> Freeing large numbers of namespaces in quick succession can result in
> a bottleneck on the synchronize_rcu() invoked from kern_unmount().
> This patch applies the synchronize_rcu_expedited() hammer to allow
> further testing and fault isolation.
>
> Hey, at least there was no need to change the comment! ;-)
>
I don’t think this will be fast enough. I think the problem is that commit e1eb26fa62d04ec0955432be1aa8722a97cb52e7 is putting all of the ipc namespace frees onto a list, and every free includes one call to synchronize_rcu()
The end result is that we can create new namespaces much much faster than we can free them, and eventually we run out. I found this while debugging clone() returning ENOSPC because create_ipc_ns() was returning ENOSPC.
-chris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists