[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <afdf21e9-7576-473d-bcee-7ee8bd373fae@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:33:07 -0500
From: "Slade Watkins" <slade@...dewatkins.com>
To: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Guenter Roeck" <linux@...ck-us.net>, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
"Pavel Machek" <pavel@...x.de>,
"Jon Hunter" <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"Sudip Mukherjee" <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/116] 5.10.101-rc1 review
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022, at 4:24 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.101 release.
> There are 116 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 16 Feb 2022 09:24:36 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
5.10.101-rc1 on my x86_64 test system compiled and booted with no errors or regressions.
Tested-by: Slade Watkins <slade@...dewatkins.com>
Thanks,
Slade
Powered by blists - more mailing lists