lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 14 Feb 2022 15:36:27 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH printk v1 02/13] printk: cpu sync always disable
 interrupts

On (22/02/11 13:58), Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Mon 2022-02-07 20:49:12, John Ogness wrote:
> > The CPU sync functions are a NOP for !CONFIG_SMP. But for
> > !CONFIG_SMP they still need to disable interrupts in order to
> > preserve context within the CPU sync sections.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
> 
> Good catch!
> 
> It is interesting that the original code did not disable interrupts
> around __dump_stack() on non-SMP, see the commit 766c268bc6d39b8124
> ("lib/dump_stack: move cpu lock to printk.c"). But it was rather
> a bug. The patch makes perfect sense.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>

Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ