[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YgoJvSFFTSb6apGl@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 23:50:21 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Nick Hu <nickhu@...estech.com>,
Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>,
Vincent Chen <deanbo422@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] microblaze: remove CONFIG_SET_FS
I like the series a lot.
Superficial comments:
for nds32 is there any good reason why __get_user / __set_user check
the address limit directly? Maybe we should unify this and make it work
like the other architectures.
With "uaccess: add generic __{get,put}_kernel_nofault" we should be able
to remove HAVE_GET_KERNEL_NOFAULT entirely and just check if the helpers
are already defined in linux/uaccess.h.
The new generic __access_ok, and the 3 fixed up version early on
have a whole lot of superflous braces.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists