linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] i2c: designware: remove unneeded semicolon

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:07:59 +0100
From:   Jan Dąbroś <jsd@...ihalf.com>
To:     Yang Li <yang.lee@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] i2c: designware: remove unneeded semicolon

pon., 14 lut 2022 o 02:03 Yang Li <yang.lee@...ux.alibaba.com> napisał(a):
>
> Eliminate the following coccicheck warning:
> ./drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdpsp.c:248:2-3: Unneeded semicolon
>
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdpsp.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdpsp.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdpsp.c
> index 752e0024db03..f589d3a1a19e 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdpsp.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdpsp.c
> @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static int psp_acquire_i2c_bus(void)
>         if (psp_i2c_access_count) {
>                 psp_i2c_access_count++;
>                 goto cleanup;
> -       };
> +       }

Thanks. While fixing this, please do the same for the 'switch' in
check_i2c_req_sts() function above. Isn't your tool reporting this?

Best Regards,
Jan