[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a3114a04f293714a3ed2eaf131e33a812b31d10a.camel@sylv.io>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:31:12 +0100
From: sylv <sylv@...v.io>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] pmbus (pli1209bc): Add regulator support
On Fri, 2022-02-11 at 11:44 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 2/11/22 09:17, Marcello Sylvester Bauer wrote:
> > Add regulator support for PLI1209BC Digital Supervisor.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marcello Sylvester Bauer <sylv@...v.io>
> > ---
> > drivers/hwmon/pmbus/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++
> > drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pli1209bc.c | 33
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/Kconfig
> > b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/Kconfig
> > index 831db423bea0..e64e0f2d93c9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/Kconfig
> > @@ -319,6 +319,14 @@ config SENSORS_PLI1209BC
> > This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the
> > module will
> > be called pli1209bc.
> >
> > +config SENSORS_PLI1209BC_REGULATOR
> > + bool "Regulator support for PLI1209BC"
> > + depends on SENSORS_PLI1209BC && REGULATOR
> > + help
> > + If you say yes here you get regulator support for Vicor
> > PLI1209BC
> > + Digital Supervisor.
> > +
> > +
>
> Single empty line please
ack.
>
> > config SENSORS_PM6764TR
> > tristate "ST PM6764TR"
> > help
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pli1209bc.c
> > b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pli1209bc.c
> > index da345eb105fd..ec479b22aa10 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pli1209bc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pli1209bc.c
> > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> > #include <linux/i2c.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/pmbus.h>
> > +#include <linux/regulator/driver.h>
> > #include "pmbus.h"
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -32,11 +33,39 @@ static int pli1209bc_read_word_data(struct
> > i2c_client *client, int page,
> > if (data < 0)
> > return data;
> > return div_s64(data + 5LL, 10L);
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SENSORS_PLI1209BC_REGULATOR)
>
> I don't think this needs to be conditional.
Sure, this would cause a redundant status check, if regulator support
is disabled. But that's not a big overhead I guess.
>
> > + /*
> > + * PMBUS_READ_VOUT and PMBUS_READ_TEMPERATURE_1 returns
> > invalid data,
>
> s/returns/return/ and no ','
ack.
Thanks,
Marcello
>
> > + * when the BCM is turned off. Since it is not possible to
> > return
> > + * ENODATA error, return zero instead.
> > + */
> > + case PMBUS_READ_VOUT:
> > + case PMBUS_READ_TEMPERATURE_1:
> > + data = pmbus_read_word_data(client, page, phase,
> > + PMBUS_STATUS_WORD);
> > + if (data < 0)
> > + return data;
> > + if (data & PB_STATUS_POWER_GOOD_N)
> > + return 0L;
> > + return pmbus_read_word_data(client, page, phase,
> > reg);
> > +#endif
> > default:
> > return -ENODATA;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SENSORS_PLI1209BC_REGULATOR)
> > +static const struct regulator_desc pli1209bc_reg_desc = {
> > + .name = "vout2",
> > + .id = 1,
> > + .of_match = of_match_ptr("vout2"),
> > + .regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators"),
> > + .ops = &pmbus_regulator_ops,
> > + .type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE,
> > + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > +};
> > +#endif
> > +
> > static struct pmbus_driver_info pli1209bc_info = {
> > .pages = 2,
> > .format[PSC_VOLTAGE_IN] = direct,
> > @@ -64,6 +93,10 @@ static struct pmbus_driver_info pli1209bc_info =
> > {
> > | PMBUS_HAVE_TEMP | PMBUS_HAVE_STATUS_TEMP
> > | PMBUS_HAVE_STATUS_IOUT | PMBUS_HAVE_STATUS_INPUT,
> > .read_word_data = pli1209bc_read_word_data,
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SENSORS_PLI1209BC_REGULATOR)
> > + .num_regulators = 1,
> > + .reg_desc = &pli1209bc_reg_desc,
> > +#endif
> > };
> >
> > static int pli1209bc_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists