| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Ygm+5rS7Cxeea5Dp@google.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 18:31:02 -0800
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Derek Basehore <dbasehore@...omium.org>,
Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"loic.poulain@...aro.org" <loic.poulain@...aro.org>,
Andrew Duggan <aduggan@...aptics.com>,
vincent.huang@...synaptics.com, cheiny@...aptics.com,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
linux-input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: 5.17-rc regression: rmi4 clients cannot deal with asynchronous
suspend? (was: X1 Carbon touchpad not resumed)
Hi Hugh, Jarkko,
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 04:57:53PM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 2/8/22 04:50, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Feb 2022, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 01:41:36PM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
> > > > > > > Bisection led to 172d931910e1db800f4e71e8ed92281b6f8c6ee2
> > > > > > > ("i2c: enable async suspend/resume on i2c client devices")
> > > > > > > and reverting that fixes it for me.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank you for the report plus bisection and sorry for the regression!
> > > > >
> > > > > +1, Thanks for the bisection, and apologies for the inconveniences.
> > > > >
> > > > > The problem here seems to be that for some reason, some devices (all
> > > > > connected to rmi4 adapter) failed to resume, but only when
> > > > > asynchronous suspend is enabled (by 172d931910e1):
> > > > >
> > > > > [ 79.221064] rmi4_smbus 6-002c: failed to get SMBus version number!
> > > > > [ 79.265074] rmi4_physical rmi4-00: rmi_driver_reset_handler: Failed
> > > > > to read current IRQ mask.
> > > > > [ 79.308330] rmi4_f01 rmi4-00.fn01: Failed to restore normal operation: -6.
> > > > > [ 79.308335] rmi4_f01 rmi4-00.fn01: Resume failed with code -6.
> > > > > [ 79.308339] rmi4_physical rmi4-00: Failed to suspend functions: -6
> > > > > [ 79.308342] rmi4_smbus 6-002c: Failed to resume device: -6
> > > > > [ 79.351967] rmi4_physical rmi4-00: Failed to read irqs, code=-6
> > > > >
>
> v5.17-rc3 on Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 8th don't even suspend due the same
> commit 172d931910e1. Sadly I tested the original patch on other machine(s)
> but not on this one with rmi4 :-(
>
> [ 39.957293] PM: suspend entry (s2idle)
> [ 40.938666] Filesystems sync: 0.980 seconds
> [ 40.942751] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.001 seconds)
> done.
> [ 40.945511] OOM killer disabled.
> [ 40.946111] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.001
> seconds) done.
> [ 40.948590] printk: Suspending console(s) (use no_console_suspend to
> debug)
> [ 40.993123] i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.4: No response
> [ 40.993218] rmi4_f01 rmi4-00.fn01: Failed to write sleep mode: -6.
> [ 40.993232] rmi4_f01 rmi4-00.fn01: Suspend failed with code -6.
> [ 40.993241] rmi4_physical rmi4-00: Failed to suspend functions: -6
> [ 40.993404] rmi4_smbus 1-002c: Failed to suspend device: -6
> [ 40.993414] PM: dpm_run_callback(): rmi_smb_suspend+0x0/0x30 [rmi_smbus]
> returns -6
> [ 40.993438] rmi4_smbus 1-002c: PM: failed to suspend async: error -6
> [ 41.014198] PM: Some devices failed to suspend, or early wake event
> detected
> [ 41.021544] i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.4: No response
> [ 41.021612] rmi4_f03 rmi4-00.fn03: rmi_f03_pt_write: Failed to write to
> F03 TX register (-6).
> [ 41.022189] i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.4: No response
> [ 41.022230] rmi4_f03 rmi4-00.fn03: rmi_f03_pt_write: Failed to write to
> F03 TX register (-6).
> [ 41.023480] i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.4: No response
> [ 41.023542] rmi4_physical rmi4-00: rmi_driver_clear_irq_bits: Failed to
> change enabled interrupts!
> [ 41.033850] i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.4: No response
> [ 41.034006] OOM killer enabled.
> [ 41.035449] i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.4: No response
> [ 41.035722] Restarting tasks ...
> [ 41.036705] rmi4_physical rmi4-00: rmi_driver_set_irq_bits: Failed to
> change enabled interrupts!
> [ 41.038367] done.
> [ 41.039003] psmouse: probe of serio2 failed with error -1
> [ 41.071700] PM: suspend exit
Sorry for the delay, but I wonder if you could try the patch below and
tell me if that also fixes the issue for you?
Also adding Hans as to make sure changes to psmouse_smbus make sense to
him.
Thanks!
diff --git a/drivers/input/mouse/psmouse-smbus.c b/drivers/input/mouse/psmouse-smbus.c
index a472489ccbad..164f6c757f6b 100644
--- a/drivers/input/mouse/psmouse-smbus.c
+++ b/drivers/input/mouse/psmouse-smbus.c
@@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ static void psmouse_smbus_detach_i2c_client(struct i2c_client *client)
"Marking SMBus companion %s as gone\n",
dev_name(&smbdev->client->dev));
smbdev->dead = true;
+ device_link_remove(&smbdev->client->dev,
+ &smbdev->psmouse->ps2dev.serio->dev);
serio_rescan(smbdev->psmouse->ps2dev.serio);
} else {
list_del(&smbdev->node);
@@ -174,6 +176,8 @@ static void psmouse_smbus_disconnect(struct psmouse *psmouse)
kfree(smbdev);
} else {
smbdev->dead = true;
+ device_link_remove(&smbdev->client->dev,
+ &psmouse->ps2dev.serio->dev);
psmouse_dbg(smbdev->psmouse,
"posting removal request for SMBus companion %s\n",
dev_name(&smbdev->client->dev));
@@ -270,6 +274,12 @@ int psmouse_smbus_init(struct psmouse *psmouse,
if (smbdev->client) {
/* We have our companion device */
+ if (!device_link_add(&smbdev->client->dev,
+ &psmouse->ps2dev.serio->dev,
+ DL_FLAG_STATELESS))
+ psmouse_warn(psmouse,
+ "failed to set up link with iSMBus companion %s\n",
+ dev_name(&smbdev->client->dev));
return 0;
}
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists