[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YgvBuqxA/FWsNh1d@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 12:07:38 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
coresight@...ts.linaro.org, Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf: cs-etm: No-op refactor of synth opt usage
Em Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 11:20:26PM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 08:06:19PM +0000, James Clark wrote:
> > sample_branches and sample_instructions are already saved in the
> > synth_opts struct. Other usages like synth_opts.last_branch don't save
> > a value, so make this more consistent by always going through synth_opts
> > and not saving duplicate values.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
>
> The patch looks good to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Thanks, applied.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists