[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b896e06f871645a6a2fb9a6f6cf4a8ff@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 17:04:56 +0000
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
"zohar@...ux.ibm.com" <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
"shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
"ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
"daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"andrii@...nel.org" <andrii@...nel.org>,
"kpsingh@...nel.org" <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
"revest@...omium.org" <revest@...omium.org>
CC: "linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 3/6] bpf-lsm: Introduce new helper bpf_ima_file_hash()
> From: Yonghong Song [mailto:yhs@...com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2022 6:03 PM
> On 2/15/22 4:40 AM, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > ima_file_hash() has been modified to calculate the measurement of a file on
> > demand, if it has not been already performed by IMA. For compatibility
> > reasons, ima_inode_hash() remains unchanged.
> >
> > Keep the same approach in eBPF and introduce the new helper
> > bpf_ima_file_hash() to take advantage of the modified behavior of
> > ima_file_hash().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
> > ---
> > include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 11 +++++++++++
> > kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 11 +++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> > index b0383d371b9a..ba33d5718d6b 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> > @@ -4648,6 +4648,16 @@ union bpf_attr {
> > * **-EOPNOTSUP** if IMA is disabled or **-EINVAL** if
> > * invalid arguments are passed.
> > *
> > + * long bpf_ima_file_hash(struct file *file, void *dst, u32 size)
> > + * Description
> > + * Returns a calculated IMA hash of the *file*.
> > + * If the hash is larger than *size*, then only *size*
> > + * bytes will be copied to *dst*
> > + * Return
> > + * The **hash_algo** is returned on success,
> > + * **-EOPNOTSUP** if the hash calculation failed or **-EINVAL**
> if
> > + * invalid arguments are passed.
> > + *
> > * struct socket *bpf_sock_from_file(struct file *file)
> > * Description
> > * If the given file represents a socket, returns the associated
> > @@ -5182,6 +5192,7 @@ union bpf_attr {
> > FN(bprm_opts_set), \
> > FN(ktime_get_coarse_ns), \
> > FN(ima_inode_hash), \
> > + FN(ima_file_hash), \
>
> Please put the above FN(ima_file_hash) to the end of the list.
> Otherwise, we have a backward compatability issue.
Hi Yonghong
sure, will do.
Thanks
Roberto
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063
Managing Director: Li Peng, Zhong Ronghua
> > FN(sock_from_file), \
> > FN(check_mtu), \
> > FN(for_each_map_elem), \
> > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
> > index 9e4ecc990647..e8d27af5bbcc 100644
> > --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
> > +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
> [...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists