linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] scsi: ufs: remove clk_scaling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <da58f5c9-74a7-f44c-a8b8-78e694b41ed9@acm.org>
Date:   Tue, 15 Feb 2022 09:09:31 -0800
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>, Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@...sung.com>,
        'Adrian Hunter' <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        'Avri Altman' <Avri.Altman@....com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        alim.akhtar@...sung.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, beanhuo@...ron.com,
        cang@...eaurora.org, sc.suh@...sung.com, hy50.seo@...sung.com,
        sh425.lee@...sung.com, bhoon95.kim@...sung.com,
        vkumar.1997@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] scsi: ufs: remove clk_scaling_lock when clkscaling
 isn't supported.

On 2/15/22 03:00, Bean Huo wrote:
> The name of clk_scaling_lock has explained everything, for the platform
> which doesn't support load-based clk scaling, doesn't need to hold this
> lock.

Hi Bean,

Have you noticed Adrian's reply? I agree with Adrian that this patch 
breaks the UFS error handler.

Bart.