linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/2] x86/PCI: Ignore EFI memmap MMIO entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0ieyKDzwPUZwfcznhABmM24fm3U7Pzea7tBoaCs9hKizw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 Feb 2022 18:20:53 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com>,
        Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@...il.com>,
        Benoit Grégoire <benoitg@...us.ca>,
        Hui Wang <hui.wang@...onical.com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] x86/PCI: Ignore EFI memmap MMIO entries

On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 5:12 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> On 2/14/22 16:17, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Here is a new attempt at fixing the issue where on some laptops
> > there are EFI memmap MMIO entries covering the entire PCI bridge
> > mem window, causing Linux to be unable to find free space to
> > assign to unassigned BARs.
> >
> > This is marked as RFC atm because I'm waiting for feedback from
> > testers.
>
> Unfortunately the troublesome 0xdfa00000-0xdfa0ffff region on
> the Lenovo X1 carbon gen 2 is marked as MMIO by the EFI memmap,
> so the approach from this series won't work.
>
> Interestingly enough this RFC series does seem to help to fix
> the suspend/resume on this x1c2, since for some reason merely
> splitting the original:
>
> BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000dceff000-0x00000000dfa0ffff] reserved
>
> range into:
>
> BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000dceff000-0x00000000df9fffff] reserved
> BIOS-e820: [mem 0x00000000dfa00000-0x00000000dfa0ffff] MMIO
>
> causes the PCI resource allocation code to pick slightly
> different resources avoiding the troublesome overlap, see:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029207
> for logs.
>
> But I don't think we should rely in this, since from a
> arch_remove_reservations() pov the troublesome overlap area
> which is now marked as MMIO is fair game for PCI bars with
> the change to allow MMIO areas for PCI bars, so things seem
> to mostly work by sheer luck after this RFC series.
>
> So now I have yet another plan to fix this (see below) I'll get
> that tested and assuming it works post that as a proper patch.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pci_x86.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pci_x86.h
> index 490411dba438..573e1323f490 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pci_x86.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pci_x86.h
> @@ -64,6 +64,8 @@ void pcibios_scan_specific_bus(int busn);
>
>  /* pci-irq.c */
>
> +struct pci_dev;
> +
>  struct irq_info {
>         u8 bus, devfn;                  /* Bus, device and function */
>         struct {
> @@ -232,3 +234,9 @@ static inline void mmio_config_writel(void __iomem *pos, u32 val)
>  # define x86_default_pci_init_irq      NULL
>  # define x86_default_pci_fixup_irqs    NULL
>  #endif
> +
> +#if defined CONFIG_PCI && defined CONFIG_ACPI
> +extern bool pci_use_e820;
> +#else
> +#define pci_use_e820 true
> +#endif
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/resource.c b/arch/x86/kernel/resource.c
> index 9b9fb7882c20..e8dc9bc327bd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/resource.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/resource.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>  #include <linux/ioport.h>
>  #include <asm/e820/api.h>
> +#include <asm/pci_x86.h>
>
>  static void resource_clip(struct resource *res, resource_size_t start,
>                           resource_size_t end)
> @@ -28,6 +29,9 @@ static void remove_e820_regions(struct resource *avail)
>         int i;
>         struct e820_entry *entry;
>
> +       if (!pci_use_e820)
> +               return;
> +
>         for (i = 0; i < e820_table->nr_entries; i++) {
>                 entry = &e820_table->entries[i];
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> index 052f1d78a562..7167934819b3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#include <linux/efi.h>
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
>  #include <linux/acpi.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
> @@ -21,6 +22,7 @@ struct pci_root_info {
>
>  static bool pci_use_crs = true;
>  static bool pci_ignore_seg;
> +bool pci_use_e820 = true;
>
>  static int __init set_use_crs(const struct dmi_system_id *id)
>  {
> @@ -291,6 +293,28 @@ static bool resource_is_pcicfg_ioport(struct resource *res)
>                 res->start == 0xCF8 && res->end == 0xCFF;
>  }
>
> +static bool resource_matches_efi_mmio_region(const struct resource *res)

I would call this resource_is_efi_mmio() FWIW.

> +{
> +       unsigned long long start, end;
> +       efi_memory_desc_t *md;
> +
> +       if (!efi_enabled(EFI_MEMMAP))
> +               return false;
> +
> +       for_each_efi_memory_desc(md) {
> +               if (md->type != EFI_MEMORY_MAPPED_IO)
> +                       continue;
> +
> +               start = md->phys_addr;
> +               end = start + (md->num_pages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT) - 1;
> +
> +               if (res->start >= start && res->end <= end)
> +                       return true;
> +       }
> +
> +       return false;
> +}
> +
>  static int pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
>  {
>         struct acpi_device *device = ci->bridge;
> @@ -300,9 +324,16 @@ static int pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
>
>         status = acpi_pci_probe_root_resources(ci);
>         if (pci_use_crs) {
> -               resource_list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &ci->resources)
> +               resource_list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &ci->resources) {
>                         if (resource_is_pcicfg_ioport(entry->res))
>                                 resource_list_destroy_entry(entry);
> +                       if (resource_matches_efi_mmio_region(entry->res)) {

I would add a pci_use_e820 check to this.

> +                               dev_info(&device->dev,
> +                                       "host bridge window %pR is marked by EFI as MMIO\n",
> +                                       entry->res);
> +                               pci_use_e820 = false;
> +                       }
> +               }
>                 return status;
>         }

Overall, it looks reasonable to me.