[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b34d235f-e22a-71dc-0c20-7be46d2182ff@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 19:07:23 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: x86: allow defining return-0 static calls
On 2/15/22 18:29, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> s/KVM_X86_OP_RET0/KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL_RET0
>
> And maybe "NULL func" instead of "NULL value", since some members of kvm_x86_ops
> hold a value, not a func.
>
>> struct kvm_x86_ops will be changed to __static_call_return0.
> This implies kvm_x86_ops itself is changed, which is incorrect. "will be patched
> to __static_call_return0() when updating static calls" or so.
>
Very good point, thanks.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists