lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b34d235f-e22a-71dc-0c20-7be46d2182ff@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 Feb 2022 19:07:23 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: x86: allow defining return-0 static calls

On 2/15/22 18:29, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> s/KVM_X86_OP_RET0/KVM_X86_OP_OPTIONAL_RET0
> 
> And maybe "NULL func" instead of "NULL value", since some members of kvm_x86_ops
> hold a value, not a func.
> 
>> struct kvm_x86_ops will be changed to __static_call_return0.
> This implies kvm_x86_ops itself is changed, which is incorrect.  "will be patched
> to __static_call_return0() when updating static calls" or so.
> 

Very good point, thanks.

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ