[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f59f86c-dbd7-7dbf-021d-bc62ebbe2a43@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 11:43:48 -0700
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
Sherry Yang <sherry.yang@...cle.com>
Cc: "shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"luto@...capital.net" <luto@...capital.net>,
"wad@...omium.org" <wad@...omium.org>,
"christian@...uner.io" <christian@...uner.io>,
"ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
"daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"andrii@...nel.org" <andrii@...nel.org>,
"kafai@...com" <kafai@...com>,
"songliubraving@...com" <songliubraving@...com>,
"yhs@...com" <yhs@...com>,
"john.fastabend@...il.com" <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
"kpsingh@...nel.org" <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/seccomp: Fix seccomp failure by adding
missing headers
On 2/15/22 11:17 AM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>
> On 2/14/22 9:12 PM, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>>>> "../../../../usr/include/" directory doesn't have header files if
>>>> different output directory is used for kselftests build like "make -C
>>>> tools/tests/selftest O=build". Can you try adding recently added
>>>> variable, KHDR_INCLUDES here which makes this kind of headers inclusion
>>>> easy and correct for other build combinations as well?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Muhammad,
>>>
>>> I just pulled linux-next, and tried with KHDR_INCLUDES. It works. Very nice
>>> work! I really appreciate you made headers inclusion compatible. However,
>>> my case is a little more complicated. It will throw warnings with -I, using
>>> -isystem can suppress these warnings, more details please refer to
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/C340461A-6FD2-440A-8EFC-D7E85BF48DB5@oracle.com/
>>>
>>> According to this case, do you think will it be better to export header path
>>> (KHDR_INCLUDES) without ā-Iā?
>> Well said. I've thought about it and it seems like -isystem is better
>> than -I. I've sent a patch:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20220214160756.3543590-1-usama.anjum@collabora.com/
>> I'm looking forward to discussion on it.
> The patch has been accepted. It should appear in linux-next soon. You
> should be able to use KHDR_INCLUDES easily now.
>
Sherry,
I pulled in your patch as a fix as is for 5.17-rc5.
Using KHDR_INCLUDES can be separate patch for next release.
This way the fix is going to be pulled for this release
without dependencies on other patches.
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists