linux-kernel - Re: [syzbot] possible deadlock in worker

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 Feb 2022 07:05:05 +0900
From:   Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        Haakon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        syzbot <syzbot+831661966588c802aae9@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        OFED mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        "syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com" <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] possible deadlock in worker_thread

On 2022/02/16 2:05, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 2/15/22 04:48, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>> I do not want to do like
>>
>> -    system_wq = alloc_workqueue("events", 0, 0);
>> +    system_wq = alloc_workqueue("events", __WQ_SYSTEM_WIDE, 0);
>>
>> because the intent of this change is to ask developers to create their own WQs.
> 
> I want more developers to use the system-wide workqueues since that reduces memory usage. That matters for embedded devices running Linux.

Reserving a kernel thread for WQ_MEM_RECLAIM WQ might consume some memory,
but I don't think that creating a !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM WQ consumes much memory.