[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ygs5d3MFR7R+Z5YA@matsya>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 10:56:15 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com, tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] dmaengine: at_xdmac: Fix missing unlock in
at_xdmac_tasklet()
On 07-01-22, 10:40, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> Add the missing unlock before return from at_xdmac_tasklet().
Applied, thanks
>
> Fixes: e77e561925df ("dmaengine: at_xdmac: Fix race over irq_status")
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c b/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c
> index a1da2b4b6d73..1476156af74b 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c
> @@ -1681,8 +1681,10 @@ static void at_xdmac_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t)
> __func__, atchan->irq_status);
>
> if (!(atchan->irq_status & AT_XDMAC_CIS_LIS) &&
> - !(atchan->irq_status & error_mask))
> + !(atchan->irq_status & error_mask)) {
> + spin_unlock_irq(&atchan->lock);
> return;
> + }
>
> if (atchan->irq_status & error_mask)
> at_xdmac_handle_error(atchan);
> --
> 2.25.1
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists