[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ygs9N9VTEIwciL4o@matsya>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 11:12:15 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@...s.st.com>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@...s.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: stm32-dma: set dma_device max_sg_burst
On 17-01-22, 10:17, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> Some stm32-dma consumers [1] rather use dma_get_slave_caps() to get
> max_sg_burst of their DMA channel as dma_get_max_seg_size() is specific to
> the DMA controller.
> All stm32-dma channels have the same features so, don't need to implement
> device_caps ops. Let dma_get_slave_caps() relies on dma_device
> configuration.
> That's why this patch sets dma_device max_sg_burst to the maximum segment
> size, which is the maximum of data items that can be transferred without
> software intervention.
Applied, thanks
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists