linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] locking/rwsem: Make handoff bit handling more consistent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YgtZMtgPoteJqtbB@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 Feb 2022 08:41:38 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     chenguanyou <chenguanyou9338@...il.com>
Cc:     longman@...hat.com, dave@...olabs.net, hdanton@...a.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mazhenhua@...omi.com,
        mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, quic_aiquny@...cinc.com,
        will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] locking/rwsem: Make handoff bit handling more
 consistent

On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 12:22:18AM +0800, chenguanyou wrote:
> >> Hi Waiman, Greg,
> >> This patch has been merged in branch linux-5.16.y.
> >> Can we take it to the linux-5.10.y LTS version?
> 
> >What is "this patch"?
> 
> commit d257cc8cb8d5355ffc43a96bab94db7b5a324803 ("locking/rwsem: Make handoff bit handling more consistent")

Have you tested it on the 5.10.y branch to verify it actually works
properly for you?

If so, please provide a working backport to the stable list, as it does
not apply cleanly as-is.

thanks,

greg k-h