[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <758cd183-b2cf-3cab-7fcb-6fa485997209@csgroup.eu>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 08:33:07 +0000
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"live-patching@...r.kernel.org" <live-patching@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/13] powerpc/ftrace: Prepare ftrace_64_mprofile.S for
reuse by PPC32
Le 14/02/2022 à 18:51, Naveen N. Rao a écrit :
> Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> PPC64 mprofile versions and PPC32 are very similar.
>>
>> Modify PPC64 version so that if can be reused for PPC32.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
>> ---
>> .../powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_64_mprofile.S | 73 +++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> While I agree that ppc32 and -mprofile-kernel ftrace code are very
> similar, I think this patch adds way too many #ifdefs. IMHO, this
> makes the resultant code quite difficult to follow.
Ok, I can introduce some GAS macros for a few of them in a followup patch.
Christophe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists