[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <85da792e-d3c7-689f-e56a-9ec2cd7d9464@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 09:58:16 +0100
From: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To: Qing Wang <wangqing@...o.com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
"Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] amdgpu: assign adev after null check
Am 15.02.22 um 02:59 schrieb Qing Wang:
> From: Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>
>
> adev should be assigned after a null check
I would rather remove the NULL check altogether.
The caller is supposed to make sure that the context is valid and even
if it isn't that's not a recoverable error here.
Regards,
Christian.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c
> index 2c929fa..da114f7
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ctx.c
> @@ -259,12 +259,13 @@ static void amdgpu_ctx_fini_entity(struct amdgpu_ctx_entity *entity)
> static int amdgpu_ctx_get_stable_pstate(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx,
> u32 *stable_pstate)
> {
> - struct amdgpu_device *adev = ctx->adev;
> + struct amdgpu_device *adev;
> enum amd_dpm_forced_level current_level;
>
> if (!ctx)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + adev = ctx->adev;
> current_level = amdgpu_dpm_get_performance_level(adev);
>
> switch (current_level) {
> @@ -290,13 +291,14 @@ static int amdgpu_ctx_get_stable_pstate(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx,
> static int amdgpu_ctx_set_stable_pstate(struct amdgpu_ctx *ctx,
> u32 stable_pstate)
> {
> - struct amdgpu_device *adev = ctx->adev;
> + struct amdgpu_device *adev;
> enum amd_dpm_forced_level level;
> int r;
>
> if (!ctx)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + adev = ctx->adev;
> mutex_lock(&adev->pm.stable_pstate_ctx_lock);
> if (adev->pm.stable_pstate_ctx && adev->pm.stable_pstate_ctx != ctx) {
> r = -EBUSY;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists