[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220215094459.GC21589@blackbody.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 10:45:00 +0100
From: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>,
Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@....com.cn>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] selftests: Challenge RLIMIT_NPROC in user
namespaces
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 06:22:18PM -0700, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Please see comments below. A bit of a concern with how long this test
> will run. Did you time it?
It runs around 1 s, I didn't measure it and I used it manually only.
> How long does this test now run for with this loop?
I kept this sleep to space output from individual tasks for
better readability of output. It's not necessary for the sake of the
test. I'll remove it in next version.
> > - for (i = 0; i < NR_CHILDS; i++) {
> > + for (i = 0; i < NR_CHILDREN; i++) {
> > if (WIFEXITED(wstatus[i]))
> > warnx("(pid=%d): pid %d exited, status=%d",
> > pid, -child[i], WEXITSTATUS(wstatus[i]));
> >
>
> Please a add few more comments in the code path.
Hehe, this is inherited from the original version. (True, it's not
overly clear on its own.)
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists