[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5add799961ff3affd766787a6ee4b87f27e1cb58.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 17:51:08 +0800
From: Roger Lu <roger.lu@...iatek.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Xiaoqing Liu <Xiaoqing.Liu@...iatek.com>,
"HenryC Chen" <HenryC.Chen@...iatek.com>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Charles Yang <Charles.Yang@...iatek.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Fan Chen <fan.chen@...iatek.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Nicolas Boichat" <drinkcat@...gle.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Angus Lin <Angus.Lin@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v22 1/7] dt-bindings: soc: mediatek: add mtk svs
dt-bindings
Hi Rob,
On Mon, 2022-02-07 at 14:24 +0800, Roger Lu wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Tue, 2022-02-01 at 17:40 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 11:39:50 +0800, Roger Lu wrote:
> > > Document the binding for enabling mtk svs on MediaTek SoC.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Roger Lu <roger.lu@...iatek.com>
> > > ---
> > > .../bindings/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.yaml | 83 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/mtk-
> > > svs.yaml
> > >
> >
> >
> > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> > there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> > maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> >
> > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>
> Oh, this patch has error detected and shown in [1]. Therefore, I fix it and
> state the change at [2]. Thanks for the explanation and time to review the
> patch.
Excuse me, just for the double check. Since this issue [1] is fixed, could I add
your Reviewed-by tags back or just send the next version directly without adding
any tags. Thanks a lot.
>
> [1]
>
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20220107095200.4389-2-roger.lu@mediatek.com/__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!2KArHJHZu-89hcY8BqxHqe4fB0IVbahNropr5XS4dGEVniMY0xUfdoa5znw1VQFN$
>
> [2]
>
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/cover/20220127033956.24585-1-roger.lu@mediatek.com/__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!2KArHJHZu-89hcY8BqxHqe4fB0IVbahNropr5XS4dGEVniMY0xUfdoa5zvor4e0p$
>
> - Remove unnecessary "maxItems" from nvmem-cells in mtk-svs.yaml.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
>
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!2KArHJHZu-89hcY8BqxHqe4fB0IVbahNropr5XS4dGEVniMY0xUfdoa5zmaupAcC$
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists