linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 05/11] iommu/sva: Assign a PASID to mm on PASID allocation and free it on mm exit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Ygt4h0PgYzKOiB38@8bytes.org>
Date:   Tue, 15 Feb 2022 10:55:19 +0100
From:   Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:     Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/11] iommu/sva: Assign a PASID to mm on PASID
 allocation and free it on mm exit

On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 03:02:48PM -0800, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> PASIDs are process wide. It was attempted to use refcounted PASIDs to
> free them when the last thread drops the refcount. This turned out to
> be complex and error prone. Given the fact that the PASID space is 20
> bits, which allows up to 1M processes to have a PASID associated
> concurrently, PASID resource exhaustion is not a realistic concern.
> 
> Therefore it was decided to simplify the approach and stick with lazy
> on demand PASID allocation, but drop the eager free approach and make
> a allocated PASID lifetime bound to the life time of the process.
> 
> Get rid of the refcounting mechanisms and replace/rename the interfaces
> to reflect this new approach.
> 
> Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>

Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>