linux-kernel - linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-intel tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220215121039.1d1ec3e6@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 15 Feb 2022 12:10:39 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-intel tree

Hi all,

After merging the drm-intel tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c: In function 'handle_edid_regs':
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c:595:38: error: implicit declaration of function 'drm_edid_block_valid' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  595 |                                 if (!drm_edid_block_valid(
      |                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Presumably caused by commit

  14da21cc4671 ("drm/i915: axe lots of unnecessary includes from i915_drv.h")

I am beginning to wonder if you guys run stuff through your CI before
relasing to linux-next.  Especially important when removing #include
statements from include files :-)

I have used the drm-intel tree from next-20220214 for today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped