linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] dmaengine: sf-pdma: Get number of channel by device tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YguXQJp/b/8SzjGX@matsya>
Date:   Tue, 15 Feb 2022 17:36:24 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>
Cc:     robh+dt@...nel.org, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
        aou@...s.berkeley.edu, krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com,
        conor.dooley@...rochip.com, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
        bin.meng@...driver.com, green.wan@...ive.com,
        dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] dmaengine: sf-pdma: Get number of channel by
 device tree

On 07-02-22, 14:30, Zong Li wrote:
> It currently assumes that there are always four channels, it would
> cause the error if there is actually less than four channels. Change
> that by getting number of channel from device tree.
> 
> For backwards-compatibility, it uses the default value (i.e. 4) when
> there is no 'dma-channels' information in dts.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>
> ---
>  drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
>  drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.h |  8 ++------
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.c b/drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.c
> index f12606aeff87..2ae10b61dfa1 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.c
> @@ -482,9 +482,7 @@ static void sf_pdma_setup_chans(struct sf_pdma *pdma)
>  static int sf_pdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct sf_pdma *pdma;
> -	struct sf_pdma_chan *chan;
>  	struct resource *res;
> -	int len, chans;
>  	int ret;
>  	const enum dma_slave_buswidth widths =
>  		DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE | DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_2_BYTES |
> @@ -492,13 +490,21 @@ static int sf_pdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_16_BYTES | DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_32_BYTES |
>  		DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_64_BYTES;
>  
> -	chans = PDMA_NR_CH;
> -	len = sizeof(*pdma) + sizeof(*chan) * chans;
> -	pdma = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, len, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	pdma = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pdma), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!pdma)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	pdma->n_chans = chans;
> +	ret = of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "dma-channels",
> +				   &pdma->n_chans);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_notice(&pdev->dev, "set number of channels to default value: 4\n");

This is useful for only debug i think, so dev_dbg perhaps

> +		pdma->n_chans = PDMA_MAX_NR_CH;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (pdma->n_chans > PDMA_MAX_NR_CH) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "the number of channels exceeds the maximum\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
>  
>  	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>  	pdma->membase = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> @@ -556,7 +562,7 @@ static int sf_pdma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct sf_pdma_chan *ch;
>  	int i;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < PDMA_NR_CH; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < pdma->n_chans; i++) {
>  		ch = &pdma->chans[i];
>  
>  		devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, ch->txirq, ch);
> @@ -574,6 +580,7 @@ static int sf_pdma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  static const struct of_device_id sf_pdma_dt_ids[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "sifive,fu540-c000-pdma" },
> +	{ .compatible = "sifive,pdma0" },
>  	{},
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sf_pdma_dt_ids);
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.h b/drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.h
> index 0c20167b097d..8127d792f639 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.h
> +++ b/drivers/dma/sf-pdma/sf-pdma.h
> @@ -22,11 +22,7 @@
>  #include "../dmaengine.h"
>  #include "../virt-dma.h"
>  
> -#define PDMA_NR_CH					4
> -
> -#if (PDMA_NR_CH != 4)
> -#error "Please define PDMA_NR_CH to 4"
> -#endif
> +#define PDMA_MAX_NR_CH					4
>  
>  #define PDMA_BASE_ADDR					0x3000000
>  #define PDMA_CHAN_OFFSET				0x1000
> @@ -118,7 +114,7 @@ struct sf_pdma {
>  	void __iomem            *membase;
>  	void __iomem            *mappedbase;
>  	u32			n_chans;
> -	struct sf_pdma_chan	chans[PDMA_NR_CH];
> +	struct sf_pdma_chan	chans[PDMA_MAX_NR_CH];

why waste memory allocating max, we know number of channels in probe,
why not allocate runtime?

-- 
~Vinod