[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86bbb33e-1e9b-70f9-237c-d0c02537380c@bytedance.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 20:23:13 +0800
From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: arbn@...dex-team.com, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Minye Zhu <zhuminye@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [Phishing Risk] [External] Re: [PATCH] sched/cpuacct: fix charge
percpu cpuusage
On 2022/2/15 2:57 上午, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 11:09:01AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> --- a/kernel/sched/cpuacct.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpuacct.c
>> @@ -334,15 +334,13 @@ static struct cftype files[] = {
>> */
>> void cpuacct_charge(struct task_struct *tsk, u64 cputime)
>> {
>> - struct cpuacct *ca;
>> unsigned int cpu = task_cpu(tsk);
>> + struct cpuacct *ca;
>>
>> - rcu_read_lock();
>> + lockdep_assert_rq_held(cpu_rq(cpu));
>>
>> for (ca = task_ca(tsk); ca; ca = parent_ca(ca))
>> *per_cpu_ptr(ca->cpuusage, cpu) += cputime;
>> -
>> - rcu_read_unlock();
>
> And probably expand the same to cgroup_account_cputime[_field]() too.
>
> Thanks.
>
Good suggestion, will do.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists