[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220215130044.GA7154@willie-the-truck>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 13:00:44 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...wei.com>
Cc: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
helgaas@...nel.org, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, suzuki.poulose@....com,
mike.leach@...aro.org, leo.yan@...aro.org,
jonathan.cameron@...wei.com, daniel.thompson@...aro.org,
joro@...tes.org, john.garry@...wei.com,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com, robin.murphy@....com,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
prime.zeng@...wei.com, liuqi115@...wei.com,
zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com, linuxarm@...wei.com,
song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Make default domain type of
HiSilicon PTT device to identity
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 08:55:20PM +0800, Yicong Yang wrote:
> On 2022/1/24 21:11, Yicong Yang wrote:
> > The DMA of HiSilicon PTT device can only work with identical
> > mapping. So add a quirk for the device to force the domain
> > passthrough.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...ilicon.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > index 6dc6d8b6b368..6f67a2b1dd27 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > @@ -2838,6 +2838,21 @@ static int arm_smmu_dev_disable_feature(struct device *dev,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +#define IS_HISI_PTT_DEVICE(pdev) ((pdev)->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_HUAWEI && \
> > + (pdev)->device == 0xa12e)
> > +
> > +static int arm_smmu_def_domain_type(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + if (dev_is_pci(dev)) {
> > + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> > +
> > + if (IS_HISI_PTT_DEVICE(pdev))
> > + return IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static struct iommu_ops arm_smmu_ops = {
> > .capable = arm_smmu_capable,
> > .domain_alloc = arm_smmu_domain_alloc,
> > @@ -2863,6 +2878,7 @@ static struct iommu_ops arm_smmu_ops = {
> > .sva_unbind = arm_smmu_sva_unbind,
> > .sva_get_pasid = arm_smmu_sva_get_pasid,
> > .page_response = arm_smmu_page_response,
> > + .def_domain_type = arm_smmu_def_domain_type,
> > .pgsize_bitmap = -1UL, /* Restricted during device attach */
> > .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > };
> >
>
> Is this quirk ok with the SMMU v3 driver? Just want to confirm that I'm on the
> right way to dealing with the issue of our device.
I don't think the quirk should be in the SMMUv3 driver. Assumedly, you would
have the exact same problem if you stuck the PTT device behind a different
type of IOMMU, and so the quirk should be handled by a higher level of the
stack.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists