[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yguy5OMW477VmMuv@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 15:04:20 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...s.st.com>
Cc: hminas@...opsys.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
amelie.delaunay@...s.st.com, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: dwc2: drd: fix soft connect when gadget is
unconfigured
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 12:04:19PM +0100, Fabrice Gasnier wrote:
> When the gadget driver hasn't been (yet) configured, and the cable is
> connected to a HOST, the SFTDISCON gets cleared unconditionally, so the
> HOST tries to enumerate it.
> At the host side, this can result in a stuck USB port or worse. When
> getting lucky, some dmesg can be observed at the host side:
> new high-speed USB device number ...
> device descriptor read/64, error -110
>
> Fix it in drd, by checking the enabled flag before calling
> dwc2_hsotg_core_connect(). It will be called later, once configured,
> by the normal flow:
> - udc_bind_to_driver
> - usb_gadget_connect
> - dwc2_hsotg_pullup
> - dwc2_hsotg_core_connect
>
> Fixes: 17f934024e84 ("usb: dwc2: override PHY input signals with usb role switch support")
> Signed-off-by: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...s.st.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Fix build error: 'struct dwc2_hsotg' has no member named 'enabled';
> as reported by the kernel test robot.
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/202202112236.AwoOTtHO-lkp@intel.com/
> Add dwc2_is_device_enabled() macro to handle this.
> ---
> drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h | 2 ++
> drivers/usb/dwc2/drd.c | 6 ++++--
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h b/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h
> index 8a63da3..8a7751b 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h
> @@ -1418,6 +1418,7 @@ void dwc2_hsotg_core_connect(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg);
> void dwc2_hsotg_disconnect(struct dwc2_hsotg *dwc2);
> int dwc2_hsotg_set_test_mode(struct dwc2_hsotg *hsotg, int testmode);
> #define dwc2_is_device_connected(hsotg) (hsotg->connected)
> +#define dwc2_is_device_enabled(hsotg) ((hsotg)->enabled)
Why the extra ()? dwc2_is_device_connected does not have it, so this
one probably should not either, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists