lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 16 Feb 2022 10:01:43 -0800
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Wang Jianchao <jianchao.wan9@...il.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     hch@...radead.org, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC V2 5/6] blk-ioprio: make ioprio pluggable and modular

On 2/15/22 18:09, Wang Jianchao wrote:
> On 2022/2/16 5:26 上午, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 2/15/22 04:37, Wang Jianchao (Kuaishou) wrote:
>>> diff --git a/block/Makefile b/block/Makefile
>>> index f38eaa612929..f6a3995af285 100644
>>> --- a/block/Makefile
>>> +++ b/block/Makefile
>>> @@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_BSGLIB)    += bsg-lib.o
>>>    obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP)    += blk-cgroup.o
>>>    obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP_RWSTAT)    += blk-cgroup-rwstat.o
>>>    obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_THROTTLING)    += blk-throttle.o
>>> -obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP_IOPRIO)    += blk-ioprio.o
>>> +io-prio-y             := blk-ioprio.o
>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP_IOPRIO)    += io-prio.o
>>>    obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP_IOLATENCY)    += blk-iolatency.o
>>>    obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP_IOCOST)    += blk-iocost.o
>>>    obj-$(CONFIG_MQ_IOSCHED_DEADLINE)    += mq-deadline.o
>>
>> Is the above change really necessary?
> 
> Except for making maintaining easier on a running system, removing a
> rqos policy module with cgroup supporting can release a blk-cgroup
> policy slots. As BLKCG_MAX_POLS, the max slots number is fixed now.

It seems like my question was not clear? What I meant is that I think 
that the above changes are not necessary to build blk-ioprio as a kernel 
module.

Thanks,

Bart.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ