[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <306b80f7-1185-17b8-fb85-7241823681d0@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 10:01:43 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Wang Jianchao <jianchao.wan9@...il.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: hch@...radead.org, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC V2 5/6] blk-ioprio: make ioprio pluggable and modular
On 2/15/22 18:09, Wang Jianchao wrote:
> On 2022/2/16 5:26 上午, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 2/15/22 04:37, Wang Jianchao (Kuaishou) wrote:
>>> diff --git a/block/Makefile b/block/Makefile
>>> index f38eaa612929..f6a3995af285 100644
>>> --- a/block/Makefile
>>> +++ b/block/Makefile
>>> @@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_BSGLIB) += bsg-lib.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP) += blk-cgroup.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP_RWSTAT) += blk-cgroup-rwstat.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_THROTTLING) += blk-throttle.o
>>> -obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP_IOPRIO) += blk-ioprio.o
>>> +io-prio-y := blk-ioprio.o
>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP_IOPRIO) += io-prio.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP_IOLATENCY) += blk-iolatency.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP_IOCOST) += blk-iocost.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_MQ_IOSCHED_DEADLINE) += mq-deadline.o
>>
>> Is the above change really necessary?
>
> Except for making maintaining easier on a running system, removing a
> rqos policy module with cgroup supporting can release a blk-cgroup
> policy slots. As BLKCG_MAX_POLS, the max slots number is fixed now.
It seems like my question was not clear? What I meant is that I think
that the above changes are not necessary to build blk-ioprio as a kernel
module.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists