linux-kernel - Re: Issues with A3720 PCIe controller driver pci-aardvark.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220216200940.fwdwk5rcb4zq6dyg@pali>
Date:   Wed, 16 Feb 2022 21:09:40 +0100
From:   Pali Rohár <pali@...nel.org>
To:     Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@...vell.com>,
        Veerasenareddy Burru <vburru@...vell.com>,
        Wojciech Bartczak <wbartczak@...vell.com>
Cc:     Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>,
        Remi Pommarel <repk@...plefau.lt>, Xogium <contact@...ium.me>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Issues with A3720 PCIe controller driver pci-aardvark.c

+ Bharat, Veerasenareddy and Wojciech from Marvell

Hello! Could you please look at this email and help us with this Marvell HW issue?

On Saturday 24 July 2021 00:17:10 Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hello Konstantin!
> 
> There are issues with Marvell Armada 3720 PCIe controller when high
> performance PCIe card (e.g. WiFi AX) is connected to this SOC. Under
> heavy load PCIe controller sends fatal abort to CPU and kernel crash.
> 
> In Marvell Armada 3700 Functional Errata, Guidelines, and Restrictions
> document is described erratum 3.12 PCIe Completion Timeout (Ref #: 251)
> which may be relevant. But neither Bjorn, Thomas nor me were able to
> understood text of this erratum. And we have already spent lot of time
> on this erratum. My guess that is that in erratum itself are mistakes
> and there are missing some other important details.
> 
> Konstantin, are you able to understand this erratum? Or do you know
> somebody in Marvell who understand this erratum and can explain details
> to us? Or do you know some more details about this erratum?
> 
> Also it would be useful if you / Marvell could share text of this
> erratum with linux-pci people as currently it is available only on
> Marvell Customer Portal which requires registration with signed NDA.
> 
> In past Thomas wrote patch "according to this erratum" and I have
> rebased, rewritten and resent it to linux-pci mailing list for review:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20210624222621.4776-6-pali@kernel.org/
> 
> Similar patch is available also in kernel which is part of Marvell SDK.
> 
> Bjorn has objections for this patch as he thinks that bit DIS_ORD_CHK in
> that patch should be disabled. Seems that enabling this bit effectively
> disables PCIe strong ordering model. PCIe kernel drivers rely on PCIe
> strong ordering, so it would implicate that that bit should not be
> enabled. Which is opposite of what is mentioned patch doing.
> 
> Konstantin, could you help us with this problem?