[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220216201449.2087956-1-keescook@chromium.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 12:14:49 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] usercopy: Check valid lifetime via stack depth
Under CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY=y, when exact stack frame boundary checking
is not available (i.e. everything except x86 with FRAME_POINTER), check
a stack object as being at least "current depth valid", in the sense
that any object within the stack region but not between start-of-stack
and current_stack_pointer should be considered unavailable (i.e. its
lifetime is from a call no longer present on the stack).
Additionally report usercopy bounds checking failures with an offset
from current_stack_pointer, which may assist with diagnosing failures.
The LKDTM USERCOPY_STACK_FRAME_TO and USERCOPY_STACK_FRAME_FROM tests
(once slightly adjusted in a separate patch) will pass again with
this fixed.
Cc: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
---
mm/usercopy.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/usercopy.c b/mm/usercopy.c
index d0d268135d96..3846c1634dca 100644
--- a/mm/usercopy.c
+++ b/mm/usercopy.c
@@ -29,13 +29,20 @@
* Returns:
* NOT_STACK: not at all on the stack
* GOOD_FRAME: fully within a valid stack frame
- * GOOD_STACK: fully on the stack (when can't do frame-checking)
+ * GOOD_STACK: within the current stack (when can't frame-check exactly)
* BAD_STACK: error condition (invalid stack position or bad stack frame)
*/
static noinline int check_stack_object(const void *obj, unsigned long len)
{
const void * const stack = task_stack_page(current);
const void * const stackend = stack + THREAD_SIZE;
+#ifndef CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP
+ const void * const high = stackend;
+ const void * const low = (void *)current_stack_pointer;
+#else
+ const void * const high = (void *)current_stack_pointer;
+ const void * const low = stack;
+#endif
int ret;
/* Object is not on the stack at all. */
@@ -55,6 +62,12 @@ static noinline int check_stack_object(const void *obj, unsigned long len)
if (ret)
return ret;
+ /*
+ * Reject: object not within current stack depth.
+ */
+ if (obj < low || high < obj + len)
+ return BAD_STACK;
+
return GOOD_STACK;
}
@@ -280,7 +293,13 @@ void __check_object_size(const void *ptr, unsigned long n, bool to_user)
*/
return;
default:
- usercopy_abort("process stack", NULL, to_user, 0, n);
+ usercopy_abort("process stack", NULL, to_user,
+#ifndef CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP
+ (void *)current_stack_pointer - ptr,
+#else
+ ptr - (void *)current_stack_pointer,
+#endif
+ n);
}
/* Check for bad heap object. */
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists