linux-kernel - [PATCH] lkdtm/usercopy: Expand size of "out of frame" object

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220216201743.2088344-1-keescook@chromium.org>
Date:   Wed, 16 Feb 2022 12:17:43 -0800
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] lkdtm/usercopy: Expand size of "out of frame" object

To be sufficient out of range for the usercopy test to see the lifetime
mismatch, expand the size of the "bad" buffer, which will let it be
beyond current_stack_pointer regardless of stack growth direction.
Paired with the recent addition of stack depth checking under
CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY=y, this will correctly start tripping again.

Reported-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
---
 drivers/misc/lkdtm/usercopy.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/usercopy.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/usercopy.c
index 9161ce7ed47a..781345ea3b07 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/usercopy.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/usercopy.c
@@ -30,12 +30,12 @@ static const unsigned char test_text[] = "This is a test.\n";
  */
 static noinline unsigned char *trick_compiler(unsigned char *stack)
 {
-	return stack + 0;
+	return stack + unconst;
 }
 
 static noinline unsigned char *do_usercopy_stack_callee(int value)
 {
-	unsigned char buf[32];
+	unsigned char buf[128];
 	int i;
 
 	/* Exercise stack to avoid everything living in registers. */
@@ -43,7 +43,12 @@ static noinline unsigned char *do_usercopy_stack_callee(int value)
 		buf[i] = value & 0xff;
 	}
 
-	return trick_compiler(buf);
+	/*
+	 * Put the target buffer in the middle of stack allocation
+	 * so that we don't step on future stack users regardless
+	 * of stack growth direction.
+	 */
+	return trick_compiler(&buf[(128/2)-32]);
 }
 
 static noinline void do_usercopy_stack(bool to_user, bool bad_frame)
@@ -66,6 +71,10 @@ static noinline void do_usercopy_stack(bool to_user, bool bad_frame)
 		bad_stack -= sizeof(unsigned long);
 	}
 
+	pr_info("stack     : %px\n", (void *)current_stack_pointer);
+	pr_info("good_stack: %px-%px\n", good_stack, good_stack + sizeof(good_stack));
+	pr_info("bad_stack : %px-%px\n", bad_stack, bad_stack + sizeof(good_stack));
+
 	user_addr = vm_mmap(NULL, 0, PAGE_SIZE,
 			    PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC,
 			    MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, 0);
-- 
2.30.2