[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bkz62xp3.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 16:34:00 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Tomasz Warniełło <tomasz.warniello@...il.com>
Cc: Tomasz Warniełło <tomasz.warniello@...il.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/15] scripts: kernel-doc: Refresh the copyright lines
Tomasz Warniełło <tomasz.warniello@...il.com> writes:
> I'm not sure, why these notices need to stay at the top, but that's what
> Jonathat Corbet replied to my version 1.
Because that's how we do things with kernel code.
> Anyways, I've cleaned them up a little. Looks good?
>
> My name's included as the refreshing force of this venerable script.
Not sure if the text movement done so far crosses the bar where
copyright can be asserted or not...but I doubt anybody cares enough to
fight you on it :)
> * Transform documentation into POD (14/15)
> See step 1 for the series details.
>
> (Still not sure about this tag line, so please correct, let me know, etc.)
>
> Suggested-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Responding to review comments doesn't normally require a tag like this
unless the comment led to something new and significantly different. I
don't think it's needed here. What you can do is note that you've
responded to the comment below the "---" line.
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Warniełło <tomasz.warniello@...il.com>
> ---
> scripts/kernel-doc | 18 ++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists