linux-kernel - Re: [0/4] Add watchdog support for MT8186 SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a680164d-9be2-8f96-abe3-27e93e5c2ad2@mediatek.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Feb 2022 10:45:58 +0800
From:   Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@...iatek.com>
To:     Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>, <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        <linux@...ck-us.net>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
CC:     <runyang.chen@...iatek.com>, <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [0/4] Add watchdog support for MT8186 SoC



On 2/16/22 9:45 AM, Rex-BC Chen wrote:
> v1:
> 1. Add mt8186-resets.h to define definition of reset bits.
> 2. Add wdt compatible for MT8186.
> 
> Rex-BC Chen (2):
>    dt-bindings: watchdog: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8186
>    dt-bindings: reset: mt8186: add DSI reset bit for MMSYS
> 
> Runyang Chen (2):
>    dt-bindings: reset: mt8186: add toprgu reset-controller header file
>    watchdog: mediatek: mt8186: add wdt support
> 
>   .../devicetree/bindings/watchdog/mtk-wdt.txt  |  1 +
>   drivers/watchdog/mtk_wdt.c                    |  6 ++++
>   include/dt-bindings/reset/mt8186-resets.h     | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
>   3 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset/mt8186-resets.h
> 

Why did you drop [PATCH] tag in the subject of your patch series?
Please keep it for distinguishing it from RFC and other meaningful tags 
next time.

Thanks
Macpaul Lin