linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/panfrost: Dynamically allocate pm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 Feb 2022 10:01:15 +0100
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To:     Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...labora.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@...labora.com>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
        Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/panfrost: Dynamically allocate pm_domains

Il 15/02/22 23:32, Alyssa Rosenzweig ha scritto:
>> I'd do the oneliner changing it to 5 and be done with it. That being
>> said, we have plenty of examples of doing this both ways, so whatever
>> makes people happy.
> 
> Excellent, that's the patch I wrote originally :-)
> 
> Dropping this patch, unless Angelo (or someone else) strongly objects.


Concretely measuring would be great, but I have no strong objections about
perhaps delaying this research to another (near or far) moment.
Let's drop this for now.