lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3288f39e32f04d67a875775414dd1c14@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Feb 2022 09:04:35 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     'Jue Wang' <juew@...gle.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        "Borislav Petkov" <bp@...en8.de>
CC:     "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "patches@...ts.linux.dev" <patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] x86/mce: work around an erratum on fast string copy
 instructions.

From: Jue Wang
> Sent: 16 February 2022 05:56
> 
> The fast string copy instructions ("REP; MOVS*") could consume an
> uncorrectable memory error in the cache line _right after_ the
> desired region to copy and raise an MCE.

s/consume/trap due to/

Isn't this just putting off the inevitable panic when the
following cache line is accesses for real?

Or is this all due to that pseudo dynamic memory (xpoint?) that is
byte addressable but only really has the quality of a diak?
It which case I thought it wasn't actually usable for
normal memory anyway - so the copies are all ones which can fault.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ