linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V6 2/6] dt-bindings: mfd: pm8008: Add regulators node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1d352a57-8f03-f65b-9560-d19ebd9f2d16@quicinc.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Feb 2022 15:19:26 +0530
From:   "Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp)" <quic_c_skakit@...cinc.com>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Das Srinagesh <gurus@...eaurora.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <quic_collinsd@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_subbaram@...cinc.com>, <quic_jprakash@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 2/6] dt-bindings: mfd: pm8008: Add regulators node


On 2/16/2022 7:34 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Satya Priya (2022-02-15 00:53:47)
>> Add regulators node and their supply nodes. Add separate compatible
>> "qcom,pm8008-regulators" to differentiate between pm8008 infra
>> and pm8008 regulators mfd devices.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Satya Priya <quic_c_skakit@...cinc.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> Please remove my tag.


Okay


>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>> ---
>> Changes in V2:
>>   - As per Rob's comments changed "pm8008[a-z]?-regulator" to
>>     "^pm8008[a-z]?-regulators".
>>
>> Changes in V3:
>>   - Fixed bot errors.
>>   - As per stephen's comments, changed "^pm8008[a-z]?-regulators$" to
>>     "regulators".
>>
>> Changes in V4:
>>   - Changed compatible string to "qcom,pm8008-regulators"
>>
>> Changes in V5:
>>   - Remove compatible for regulators node.
>>   - Move supply nodes of the regulators to chip level.
>>
>> Changes in V6:
>>   - No changes.
>>
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,pm8008.yaml       | 49 +++++++++++++++++++---
>>   1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,pm8008.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,pm8008.yaml
>> index ec3138c..1ec43f7 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,pm8008.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,pm8008.yaml
>> @@ -44,6 +46,25 @@ properties:
>>     "#size-cells":
>>       const: 0
>>
>> +  vdd_l1_l2-supply:
>> +    description: Input supply phandle of ldo1 and ldo2 regulators.
>> +
>> +  vdd_l3_l4-supply:
>> +    description: Input supply phandle of ldo3 and ldo4 regulators.
>> +
>> +  vdd_l5-supply:
>> +    description: Input supply phandle of ldo5 regulator.
>> +
>> +  vdd_l6-supply:
>> +    description: Input supply phandle of ldo6 regulator.
>> +
>> +  vdd_l7-supply:
>> +    description: Input supply phandle of ldo7 regulator.
>> +
>> +  regulators:
>> +    type: object
>> +    $ref: "../regulator/qcom,pm8008-regulator.yaml#"
>> +
>>   patternProperties:
>>     "^gpio@[0-9a-f]+$":
>>       type: object
>> @@ -88,10 +109,8 @@ patternProperties:
>>   required:
>>     - compatible
>>     - reg
>> -  - interrupts
>>     - "#address-cells"
>>     - "#size-cells"
>> -  - "#interrupt-cells"
> Shouldn't interrupts and interrupt-cells still be required for
> qcom,pm8008?


No, these are not strictly required.


> This binding seems like it is for two different nodes.


This binding is for the same node with different SIDs 8 and 9, having 
different set of peripherals.


>>   additionalProperties: false
>>
>> @@ -102,7 +121,7 @@ examples:
>>       qupv3_se13_i2c {
>>         #address-cells = <1>;
>>         #size-cells = <0>;
>> -      pm8008i@8 {
>> +      pm8008_infra: pm8008@8 {
>>           compatible = "qcom,pm8008";
>>           reg = <0x8>;
>>           #address-cells = <1>;
>> @@ -123,6 +142,26 @@ examples:
>>             #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>>           };
>>         };
>> -    };
>>
>> +      pm8008_regulators: pm8008@9 {
>> +        compatible = "qcom,pm8008";
> Isn't this supposed to be "qcom,pm8008-regulators"?


Yes, I'll correct this.


>> +        reg = <0x9>;
>> +        #address-cells = <1>;
>> +        #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> +        vdd_l1_l2-supply = <&vreg_s8b_1p2>;
>> +        vdd_l3_l4-supply = <&vreg_s1b_1p8>;
>> +        vdd_l5-supply = <&vreg_bob>;
>> +        vdd_l6-supply = <&vreg_bob>;
>> +        vdd_l7-supply = <&vreg_bob>;
>> +
>> +        regulators {
> I still don't get the need for this extra container. Please remove it.


Okay.


>> +          pm8008_l1: ldo1 {
>> +            regulator-name = "pm8008_l1";
>> +            regulator-min-microvolt = <950000>;
>> +            regulator-max-microvolt = <1300000>;
>> +          };
>> +        };
>> +      };
>> +    };