[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1645004616.cxeynmpwuy.naveen@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 15:21:17 +0530
From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sathvika Vasireddy <sv@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH kernel] trace: Make FTRACE_MCOUNT_USE_RECORDMCOUNT
configurable
Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>
>
> On 2/15/22 03:10, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 4:11 PM Nick Desaulniers
>> <ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> + Sami, Kees
>>>
>>> Do you guys remember why we don't support
>>> FTRACE_MCOUNT_USE_RECORDMCOUNT with LTO?
>>
>> It's because recordmcount cannot distinguish between calls and other
>> references to mcount/fentry, which is a problem with LTO where we have
>> to process the entire vmlinux.o and cannot ignore individual
>> translation units. Instead of resorting to workarounds, Peter was kind
>> enough to implement a smarter mcount pass in objtool, which we now use
>> on x86_64 with LTO.
I had responded on a different thread about this:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1644579444.bal9kji6uc.naveen@linux.ibm.com
We are working on enabling 'objtool check --mcount' on powerpc.
>
>
> So can x86_64 have both FTRACE_MCOUNT_USE_RECORDMCOUNT and LTO?
No. x86_64 now supports HAVE_OBJTOOL_MCOUNT, which enables
FTRACE_MCOUNT_USE_OBJTOOL. That allows LTO to be used.
- Naveen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists